New findings from the large, multicentre IRON study demonstrate that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is associated with lower morbidity and similar oncologic and long-term renal function outcomes compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN).
Dr Alessandro Larcher (Ospedale San Raffaele, Italy) presented the large, non-randomised, comparative, prospective study of clinical outcomes after RAPN or OPN at 9 high-volume European, North American, and Asian institutions . The rationale behind this study was that although RAPN is commonly used, there had been little evidence conclusively indicating that one approach was better than the other.
The researchers prospectively identified patients (n=3,468) diagnosed with a cT1-2 cN0 cM0 renal mass who underwent RAPN (n=2,405) or OPN (n=1,063). Detailed preoperative data concerning the tumours was not documented in this study. Clinical outcomes were collected in a central database. For the purposes o...
please login to read the entire article:
You need to register to read the entire article, please do so now.
« Debate: upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy or not? Next Article
Reduced BCG frequency, faster NMIBC recurrence »
Table of Contents: EAU 2020
Surgical Techniques and Safety
Prostate Cancer & Imaging
BPH & LUTS
Testis Cancer & Andrology
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.