“Patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities show worse outcomes after a COVID-19 infection,” postulated Ms Jieling Chen (Gaithersburg, USA) [2]. The current study is the first systematic review designed to understand the burden and unmet needs of patients with HFpEF who are infected with COVID-19. For this analysis, 12 publications were included, 10 retrospective studies, 1 prospective study, and 1 study of which the perspective was unknown. In 9 studies, hospitalised patients with HFpEF were assessed, whereas 3 studies had investigated patients with HFpEF in-hospital and in the outpatient setting.
The findings of 4 studies demonstrated that patients with HFpEF may be at increased risk of in-hospital mortality following a COVID-19 infection compared to non-HFpEF patients. Hospitalised patients with COVID-19, but without HFpEF, had a mortality rate of 10.8-27.2%. In patients with HFpEF and hospitalised for COVID-19, this rate ranged from 23.0% to 50.2%. The corresponding mortality rate for patients with HFrEF lay between 18.6% and 46.5%. Furthermore, the risk of hospitalisation for COVID-19 may be larger in patients with HF than in patients without HF, as was shown by 3 studies. In addition, the increased risk of hospitalisation appeared to be similar in patients with HFpEF and patients with HFrEF. Also, 3 studies indicated that the need for mechanical ventilation/intubation was equal for patients with HFpEF and those with HFrEF.
Ms Chen argued that these findings imply that the burden of HFpEF in patients with COVID-19 is high and that better care and treatment are needed for patients with HFpEF as the pandemic continues.
- Chen J, et al. Effects of pre-existing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review. LBT 3, Heart Failure 2022, 21–24 May, Madrid, Spain.
- Patel P, et al. Am Heart J Plus 2022;13:100111
Copyright ©2022 Medicom Medical Publishers
Posted on
Previous Article
« Delayed initiation of novel GDMTs may wreak havoc on HF patients Next Article
‘Startling’ heart attack finding in COVID patients »
« Delayed initiation of novel GDMTs may wreak havoc on HF patients Next Article
‘Startling’ heart attack finding in COVID patients »
Table of Contents: HFA 2022
Featured articles
Online First
HFpEF burden in patients with COVID-19 calls for action
Delayed initiation of novel GDMTs may wreak havoc on HF patients
EMPULSE: empagliflozin delivers rapid and clinically meaningful decongestion
DAPA-VO2: Rapid effect of dapagliflozin on Peak VO2 in stable HFrEF
FIDELITY: Cardiorenal benefits of finerenone, regardless of LVH status
REBALANCE-HF: Encouraging results of GSN ablation in HFpEF
Dapagliflozin performs consistently across LVEF in HF
First non-adrenergic drug to show benefit on BP in pre-cardiogenic shock
HELIOS-A: Vutrisiran meets exploratory endpoints
DAPA-HF: Dapagliflozin safe and efficacious in frail patients
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy promising for patients with HFpEF
EMPEROR-Preserved: Empagliflozin stable across age groups
Should ATTR-CM be added to differential diagnosis of patients with HF?
GALACTIC-HF: Omecamtiv mecarbil option for HFrEF patients with low SBP
Related Articles
June 7, 2022
Lung cancer screening in Denmark
© 2023 Medicom Medical Publishers. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy